by Vanessa Rosa, Ph.D.
Broader Impacts Decoded: Empowering Scientists for Success 🔬🌟 Unlock the secrets to designing, implementing, and communicating high-impact, broader-impact programs that align with funding priorities and demonstrate measurable success. 🔓💡 Join Vanessa Rosa, Ph.D., and the Cuvette Collective team in thought-provoking conversations with successful research scientists, funding agency representatives, and thought leaders in the broader impacts space. 🎙️💬 Each month, we dive deep into the challenges and aspirations faced by scientists seeking to maximize their broader impacts and secure substantial funding. 📅💰 Our expert guests share their stories, strategies, and insights on topics ranging from grant writing and impact assessment to professional development and strategic partnerships. 📝📊👥 Whether you're an early-career researcher or an established scientist, "Broader Impacts Decoded" will provide you with the tools, frameworks, and inspiration to navigate the complex world of broader impacts confidently. 🧰🧭💡 Subscribe now and join a community of like-minded scientists committed to making a significant difference in their fields and the wider community. 🔔🌍 <br/><br/><a href="https://cuvette.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast">cuvette.substack.com</a>
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
9/14/2023
Email Addresses
1 available
Phone Numbers
0 available
April 23, 2024
<p>In this episode, Dr. Vanessa Rosa explores what an education system that has successfully bridged the research-practice gap would look like. She discusses three key hallmarks: prioritizing practice-based evidence, establishing systemic incentives for integration, and fostering embedded researcher-practitioner collaborations.</p><p>🎧 Core Audience</p><p>* Science educators seeking innovative, evidence-based teaching strategies</p><p>* Educational researchers interested in collaborating with practitioners</p><p>* Policymakers and administrators looking to support research-practice integration</p><p>* STEM education advocates committed to advancing equitable, engaging learning experiences</p><p>📋 Topics Covered</p><p>* The research-practice gap in education and its impact on student learning</p><p>* Critical elements of an integrated education system that bridges research and practice</p><p>* Practice-based evidence and its role in informing evidence-based instruction</p><p>* Systemic incentives and policies to support researcher-practitioner collaboration</p><p>* Embedded researcher-practitioner collaborations and their benefits for education reform</p><p>⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:</p><p>00:00 - Introduction and overview</p><p>04:16 - Visualizing a reformed system</p><p>05:01 - Defining the research-practice gap</p><p>07:24 - Practice-based evidence vs. evidence-based instruction</p><p>10:49 - Systemic incentives to support integration</p><p>13:40 - Embedded researcher-practitioner collaborations</p><p>17:37 - Conclusion and call to action</p><p>🗝️ Key Takeaways</p><p>* Valuing practice-based evidence alongside controlled experiments can lead to more context-specific, effective teaching strategies.</p><p>* Systemic incentives, such as promotion criteria, funding streams, and professional development, foster research-practice integration.</p><p>* Embedded researcher-practitioner collaborations enable real-time problem-solving, accessible research dissemination, and continuous feedback loops.</p><p>* Bridging the research-practice gap can create more equitable, engaging, and empowering learning environments that enable all students to thrive.</p><p>📄 Useful Resources</p><p>* Corresponding Blog Post: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cuvettecollective.org/closedrpgap/">www.cuvettecollective.org/closedrpgap/</a></p><p>* Cuvette Collective's professional learning community: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cuvetteempowered.org/">cuvetteempowered.org</a></p><p>* Cuvette Collective's consulting firm: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cuvettecatalyzed.org/">cuvettecatalyzed.org</a></p><p>* <em>The Cuvette</em>, a peer-reviewed journal for science education: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.thecuvette.org/">thecuvette.org</a></p><p>🎙️ About the Hosts</p><p>Dr. Vanessa Rosa:</p><p>* Advocate for science education reform and founder of Cuvette Collective.</p><p>* Passionate about transforming science education and challenging academic conventions.</p><p>* Expertise in science education research, curriculum development, and assessment.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/vanessarosaphd/">Connect with Dr. Rosa on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vanessarosaphd/</a></p><p>🙌🏽 Support the Podcast</p><p>Please consider subscribing or rating the podcast if you found this content helpful.</p><p>Thank you for supporting efforts to advance science education reform and this community!</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://cuvette.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1">cuvette.substack.com</a>
January 25, 2024
<p>🎯 Target Audience</p><p>This content would be most helpful to educators, researchers, and policy makers interested in understanding the impact of different framing strategies on policy support.</p><p>📋 Topics Covered</p><p>1. The concept of framing and its impact on understanding and policy support,</p><p>2. The effects of different framing strategies - empathy, interdependence, ingenuity, and prevention - on policy support, and</p><p>3. The implications of these findings for educators and policy makers.</p><p>⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:</p><p>00:00 - Vanessa's experience as a graduate student</p><p>01:15 - Understanding of framing</p><p>02:49 - Discussion on empathy</p><p>04:10 - Discussion on interdependence</p><p>05:24 - Discussion on ingenuity</p><p>06:31 - Discussion on prevention</p><p>07:34 - Summary of findings</p><p>07:54 - Implications and conclusion</p><p>💃🏽 Call to Action</p><p>How can we use these findings to frame our messages more effectively? How can we ensure that our framing strategies align with our audience's cultural values to promote support for systemic reform?</p><p>Let's discuss this in the chat.</p><p>🎙️ About the Host</p><p>Dr. Rosa promotes equity in science education, challenging traditional norms and oppressive systems. She leads several organizations focused on empowering diverse educators and driving systemic improvements. Here, and through these organizations, she aims to foster a community of supportive educators who will transform science education and research.</p><p>🙌🏽 Support the Podcast</p><p>If you found this content helpful, please consider <strong>subscribing </strong>to, <strong>sharing</strong>, and <strong>rating </strong>the podcast. Subscriptions are voluntary and work to keep this content ad-free and freely available.</p> <br/><br/>Get full access to Cuvette Collective 🌎 at <a href="https://cuvette.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4">cuvette.substack.com/subscribe</a>
January 18, 2024
<p><strong>Show Notes:</strong></p><p>Welcome to this first episode of <strong>The Collective Podcast</strong>! Here, Drs. Rosa and Corrales discuss the impact of framing a message that elicits support and action in reform.</p><p><strong>🎧 Core Audience</strong></p><p>Science educators, researchers, and policymakers who are interested in improving science education through effective communication and framing of messages.</p><p>Individuals seeking insights on how to craft compelling arguments and messages that resonate with diverse audiences.</p><p>Anyone interested in the intersection of science education, communication, and social change.</p><p><strong>📋 Topics Covered</strong></p><p>The importance of effective framing in advancing science education reforms.</p><p>The challenges of framing messages for impact in academic publishing and the tension between values and success metrics.</p><p>There is a need to balance empathy, interdependence, and self-interest when framing messages.</p><p>The importance of considering the intended audience and tailoring messages accordingly.</p><p>The role of authenticity and values alignment ineffective framing.</p><p><strong>🗝️ Key Takeaways</strong></p><p><strong>Empathy alone may not be enough:</strong> While empathy is crucial in understanding the experiences of marginalized groups, it may not be the most effective framing strategy for promoting change.</p><p><strong>Interdependence and self-interest:</strong> Framing messages around interdependence and self-interest can garner support for reforms more effectively. Emphasize how addressing inequities benefits everyone, not just the marginalized groups directly affected.</p><p><strong>Accessible language and practical solutions:</strong> Use clear and accessible language to communicate research findings and recommendations. Provide concrete examples and practical solutions that educators can quickly implement.</p><p><strong>Target the right audience:</strong> Consider your intended audience when framing your message. Tailor your language and examples to resonate with the specific group you're trying to reach.</p><p><strong>Authenticity and values alignment:</strong> Be authentic in your framing and ensure it aligns with your values and beliefs. Avoid diluting your message to appease reviewers or conform to norms.</p><p><strong>📄 Useful Resources</strong></p><p>Here’s the TEDx video by Dr. Nat Kendall-Taylor: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8wol2nGSpY&t=3s">How words change minds: The science of storytelling | Nat Kendall-Taylor | TEDxMidAtlanticSalon</a></p><p>We found the study referenced in the TEDx video: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8wol2nGSpY&amp;t=3s">https://www.frameworksinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/AddictionValuesPaper.pdf</a></p><p><em>Here’s how they defined interdependence:</em></p><p>“Interdependence: the idea that everyone in the province has a stake in addressing addiction.”</p><p><strong>⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:</strong></p><p>00:00 - Opening</p><p>01:40 - Overview</p><p>05:05 - Three questions</p><p>05:47 - Question 1</p><p>11:24 - Successfully framing a research paper</p><p>14:44 - Framing equity reforms</p><p>22:34 - Should we avoid empathy?</p><p>34:28 - Question 2</p><p>49:34 - “We’re academics, of course we…”</p><p>52:16 - Academics vs. social media</p><p>58:53 - Question 3</p><p><strong>🎙️ About the Hosts</strong></p><p><strong>Dr. Vanessa Rosa: </strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/vanessarosaphd/">Connect with Dr. Rosa</a></p><p>Advocate for science education reform and founder of Cuvette Collective.</p><p>Passionate about transforming science education and challenging academic conventions.</p><p>Expertise in science education research, curriculum development, and assessment.</p><p><strong>Dr. Adri Corrales: </strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/adriana-corrales-6a3280124/">Connect with Dr. Corrales</a></p><p>Education researcher, educator, and director of community engagement for Cuvette Collective.</p><p>Focus on equity and inclusion in science education.</p><p>Expertise in qualitative research methods and critical theory.</p><p><strong>🙌🏽 Support the Podcast</strong></p><p>If you found this content helpful, please consider <strong>subscribing </strong>to, <strong>sharing</strong>, and <strong>rating </strong>the podcast.</p><p>Thank you for supporting efforts to advance science education reform and this community!</p> <br/><br/>Get full access to Cuvette Collective 🌎 at <a href="https://cuvette.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4">cuvette.substack.com/subscribe</a>
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at [email protected] for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.