by 蕭奕弘律師
<p>跟我一起讀判決，談論法律大小事 <br /> <br />想了解更多法律資訊，歡迎分享、訂閱！ <br /> <br />📌一起讀判決：最新重要實務判決資訊 <br />免費電子報訂閱 👉 https://casebf.com/subscribe/ <br />Facebook粉專 👉 https://www.facebook.com/legal.taiwan/ <br />Twitter 👉https://twitter.com/oneminlaw <br /> <br />📌1分鐘法律教室 <br />[IG]👉 https://www.instagram.com/oneminlaw/ <br /> <br />📌法律試金石：法律初學者的好夥伴 <br />[FB]👉 https://www.facebook.com/lawstone100/ <br />[IG] 👉 https://www.instagram.com/lawstone100/ <br /> <br />📌影音平台Youtube👉 https://www.youtube.com/@lawstone <br /> <br />📌蕭奕弘律師臉書👉 https://www.facebook.com/idozone/ <br /> <br />📌蕭奕弘律師事務所👉 https://attorney.idozone.com.tw/ <br /> <br /> <br/>Powered by <a href="https://firstory.me/zh">Firstory Hosting</a></p>
Language
🇨🇳
Publishing Since
1/20/2022
Email Addresses
1 available
Phone Numbers
0 available
March 19, 2025
<p>日前，「一起讀判決」粉絲專頁分享了一起涉及 「禁止轉掛派遣工」 的訴訟案件，該案由派遣勞工對臺北地檢署提起訴訟，並在一審勝訴。此外，這也是全台首例適用《勞基法》第 17-1 條的判決，引發廣泛關注。 <br /> <br />這起案件的迴響十分熱烈，顯然公務機關濫用勞動派遣的狀況，確實讓許多人感同身受。 <br /> <br />因此，Stella 將在本集深入解析這起案件，並帶大家了解 2019 年勞動基準法針對 「假派遣、真僱用」 所進行的兩次修法，重點包括：第 17-1 條禁止轉掛派遣工、第 22-1 條工資給付補充責任，以及第 63-1 條職業災害的連帶責任。 <br /> <br />在這一集，你將會聽到： <br />📌2019年的勞基法兩次修法，納入了哪些保護派遣勞工的規範？ <br />📌勞動基準法第 17-1 條如何防止「假派遣、真僱用」？ <br />📌臺北地檢署為何違法？法院怎麼判？ <br /> <br />別讓「假派遣」影響了你的權益，一起來了解這場關鍵的法律攻防！ <br /> <br />留言告訴我你對這一集的想法： <a href="https://open.firstory.me/user/ckylcmqx70wvx0874jbmodzy5/comments">https://open.firstory.me/user/ckylcmqx70wvx0874jbmodzy5/comments</a> <br /> <br />－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－ <br />想了解更多法律資訊，歡迎分享、訂閱！ <br /> <br />📌一起讀判決：📌最新重要實務判決資訊 <br />免費電子報訂閱 👉 https://casebf.com/subscribe/ <br />Facebook粉專 👉 https://www.facebook.com/legal.taiwan/ <br />Twitter 👉https://twitter.com/oneminlaw <br /> <br />📌1分鐘法律教室 <br />[IG]👉 https://www.instagram.com/oneminlaw/ <br /> <br />📌法律試金石：法律初學者的好夥伴 <br />[FB]👉 https://www.facebook.com/lawstone100/ <br />[IG] 👉 https://www.instagram.com/lawstone100/ <br /> <br />📌影音平台Youtube👉 <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@lawstone" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/@lawstone</a> <br /> <br />📌蕭奕弘律師臉書👉 <a href="https://www.facebook.com/idozone/" target="_blank">https://www.facebook.com/idozone/</a></p> <br /> <br/>Powered by <a href="https://firstory.me/zh">Firstory Hosting</a>
December 24, 2024
<p>遺贈稅法第15條規定，被繼承人在死前兩年內贈與給配偶的財產，會被視為遺產來課稅，元配利用這招反擊先生外遇所生下的女兒，使得這名非婚生子女，雖然繼承1500萬的遺產，但必須付出5700萬的遺產稅。 <br /> <br />另外一個案件則是，被繼承人生前兩年贈與給配偶的財產，必須加計入被繼承人的遺產總額，而沒有遺贈稅法第17-1條的適用，導致繼承人必須繳納更多的遺產稅，這是否有公平性的問題? <br /> <br />此外，奕弘跟宇修也觀察到，這是次的憲法判決，罕見地有教授擔任聲請人法官的訴訟代理人，參與本案的憲法訴訟說明會。 <br />在這一集你可以聽到： <br /> <br />一、遺產稅是透過徵稅的手段，讓財富間的代間流動，可以更符合社會重分配的效果，但卻發生了非預期的效果？ <br />二、擬制遺產是否有違反量能課稅的原則？ <br />三、楊惠欽大法官針對剩餘財產分配請求權的案件，提出了唯一的一份不同意見書，他的理由是什麼？ <br /> <br />留言告訴我你對這一集的想法： <a href="https://open.firstory.me/user/ckylcmqx70wvx0874jbmodzy5/comments">https://open.firstory.me/user/ckylcmqx70wvx0874jbmodzy5/comments</a> <br />－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－ <br />想了解更多法律資訊，歡迎分享、訂閱！ <br /> <br />📌一起讀判決：📌最新重要實務判決資訊 <br />免費電子報訂閱 👉 https://casebf.com/subscribe/ <br />Facebook粉專 👉 https://www.facebook.com/legal.taiwan/ <br />Twitter 👉https://twitter.com/oneminlaw <br /> <br />📌1分鐘法律教室 <br />[IG]👉 https://www.instagram.com/oneminlaw/ <br /> <br />📌法律試金石：法律初學者的好夥伴 <br />[FB]👉 https://www.facebook.com/lawstone100/ <br />[IG] 👉 https://www.instagram.com/lawstone100/ <br /> <br />📌影音平台Youtube👉 <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@lawstone" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/@lawstone</a> <br /> <br />📌蕭奕弘律師臉書👉 <a href="https://www.facebook.com/idozone/" target="_blank">https://www.facebook.com/idozone/</a> <br />－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－</p> <br /> <br/>Powered by <a href="https://firstory.me/zh">Firstory Hosting</a>
December 16, 2024
Taipei Medical Association President Dr. Cai and the Ministry of Health and Welfare debate the constitutionality of a doctor's right to pre-collect medical fees, with the high court weighing in on the matter.
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at [email protected] for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.
